Over the last few months most conservatives have quite
naturally been distracted by Barack Obama's frightening incompetence, his
elephantine spending, and his zealous attempts to swallow as much of the
private sector as the government beast can stuff down its gaping maw. But while
the cat's away, the mice will play. The little feet you may have been hearing
pitter-patter back into the public square? They belong to advocates of amnesty
for illegal aliens. Oh, they don't necessarily call it that. They call it
comprehensive immigration reform, earned legalization, a path to citizenship --
but, it all amounts to the same thing: rewarding people for breaking our laws.
1) It will only encourage more illegal immigrants to come
here. We've already had a "one time only" amnesty deal for
illegals. It occurred during the Reagan Administration and the idea was
supposed to be that we'd allow the illegals who were here to become citizens
and we'd simultaneously beef up security to try to keep the problem from
occurring again. Well, guess what? That very bipartisan sounding compromise
didn't work. To the contrary, it failed miserably. So why in the world would
anyone who actually wants to stop illegal immigration want to try something
that has already been proven to be counterproductive? We have far more illegals
in America
today than we did when the "one time" amnesty went through.
Do we want 20 million illegals here when the next amnesty goes through? 30
million? Are we going to be accused of racism if we say the next huge wave of
illegals shouldn't be given citizenship either? Where does it end?
3) We're importing poverty. It's no secret that the
majority of illegals are uneducated manual laborers. In fact, that's supposed
to be one of their selling points, isn't it? Don't advocates of amnesty say we
need illegals to do the dirty, hard, manual labor that "Americans won't
do?" But even if that were true, which it’s not, people with very limited
skills often turn into liabilities for a society as they age. There aren't a
lot of people picking oranges and scrubbing floors at fifty years old. In other
words, in order to help crooked business owners get cheap labor today, the rest
of society has to be burdened with people who are going to cost society far
more than they ever pay in taxes. Are American taxpayers so unburdened that we
want to actually bring in even more people to carry on their backs?
No comments:
Post a Comment